• Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Thank you
Profit News Report
No Result
View All Result
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
No Result
View All Result
Profit News Report
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's Pick

Schumer moves to force Senate to take legal action against DOJ, Trump admin over Epstein doc dump

by
December 22, 2025
in Editor's Pick
0
Schumer moves to force Senate to take legal action against DOJ, Trump admin over Epstein doc dump
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Senate Democrats are mounting a legal offensive against the Trump administration for its handling of the release of files and materials related to Jeffrey Epstein, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has teed up the first salvo. 

Schumer on Monday announced that he would file a resolution that would compel the Senate to take legal action against the Trump administration for ‘illegally refusing to release the complete Epstein files and heavily redacting the files that are released.’ 

‘The law Congress passed is crystal clear: release the Epstein files in full, so Americans can see the truth,’ Schumer said in a statement. ‘Instead, the Trump Department of Justice dumped redactions and withheld the evidence — that breaks the law. Today, I am introducing a resolution to force the Senate to take legal action and compel this administration to comply.’

Schumer’s move comes just days after the Department of Justice (DOJ) dumped several hundred thousand documents and photos from its trove of materials related to the late Epstein. Schumer and Senate Democrats warned ahead of the document dump on Friday that unless the DOJ fully complied with the recently passed law, they would seek legal action.

They argue that Attorney General Pam Bondi and the DOJ didn’t follow the law, which Congress passed nearly unanimously out of both chambers last month.

Schumer, who forced a successful vote in the Senate on the Epstein Files Transparency Act, previously argued that the ‘heavily redacted documents released by the Department of Justice today is just a fraction of the whole body of evidence.’

‘Simply releasing a mountain of blacked-out pages violates the spirit of transparency and the letter of the law,’ Schumer said in a statement. ‘For example, all 119 pages of one document were completely blacked out. We need answers as to why.’

The law required that the DOJ release all unclassified records related to Epstein, his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, known associates and entities linked to Epstein and Maxwell, internal DOJ decision-making on the Epstein case, records on destroying or tampering with documents, and all documents on his detention and death.

There were narrow exceptions to what the government could opt against releasing, including materials that reveal victims’ identities or medical files, child sex abuse materials, information that could jeopardize active investigations, images of graphic death or injury, or classified national security information.

Schumer and congressional Democrats, along with some congressional Republicans, were already peeved that the DOJ wasn’t going to dump every document in its possession by Friday’s deadline.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that day that the agency would be taking a phased approach and said he expected ‘that we’re going to release more documents over the next couple of weeks,’ as the DOJ worked to comb through every document to ensure ‘every victim, their name, their identity, their story, to the extent it needs to be protected, is completely protected.’

But it was the inclusion of several heavily redacted documents without explanation as to why they were blacked out that raised lawmakers’ eyebrows.

Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who also is the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said that Friday’s release ‘could have been a win for survivors, accountability, and transparency to the public. It wasn’t.’

He accused the Trump administration of breaking the law with how it handled the document dump and vowed that the Judiciary Committee would investigate.

‘Senate Judiciary Democrats will investigate this violation of law and make sure the American people know about it,’ Durbin said in a statement. ‘The survivors deserve better. It’s clear Donald Trump and his Republican enablers are working for the rich and powerful elites — and not you.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
Previous Post

Trump admin pausing all off shore wind project construction due to national security concerns

Next Post

Lawsuit claims security cameras sold in the US carried undisclosed surveillance risks

Next Post
Lawsuit claims security cameras sold in the US carried undisclosed surveillance risks

Lawsuit claims security cameras sold in the US carried undisclosed surveillance risks

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
A look back at Biden’s Remarkable 50-year career in politics

A look back at Biden’s Remarkable 50-year career in politics

March 20, 2025
Trump’s Fed Criticism Sparks Investor Concerns

Trump’s Fed Criticism Sparks Investor Concerns

April 22, 2025
Fed’s Stagflation Warning Impacts Crypto Markets

Fed’s Stagflation Warning Impacts Crypto Markets

April 21, 2025
BNB Price Surge Leads Crypto Gains as Bitcoin Climbs

BNB Price Surge Leads Crypto Gains as Bitcoin Climbs

April 21, 2025
Trump’s tariffs could be undone by one conservative doctrine: ‘Life or death’

Trump’s tariffs could be undone by one conservative doctrine: ‘Life or death’

0
Nvidia Stock Tumbles on Earnings Anticipation and AI Rivalry

Nvidia Stock Tumbles on Earnings Anticipation and AI Rivalry

0
The dollar index continues to pull back to a new low

The dollar index continues to pull back to a new low

0
BNGO Stock: BioNano Genomics Analysis and Forecast

BNGO Stock: BioNano Genomics Analysis and Forecast

0
Trump’s tariffs could be undone by one conservative doctrine: ‘Life or death’

Trump’s tariffs could be undone by one conservative doctrine: ‘Life or death’

January 16, 2026
US stocks open in the red: S&P down 0.5%, Nasdaq slips around 1%

US stocks open in the red: S&P down 0.5%, Nasdaq slips around 1%

January 16, 2026
Bank of America Q4 beat estimates, but here’s why BAC stock may stay in red

Bank of America Q4 beat estimates, but here’s why BAC stock may stay in red

January 16, 2026
Copper, aluminum climb on supply worries, but Commerzbank sees setback risk

Copper, aluminum climb on supply worries, but Commerzbank sees setback risk

January 16, 2026

Recent News

Trump’s tariffs could be undone by one conservative doctrine: ‘Life or death’

Trump’s tariffs could be undone by one conservative doctrine: ‘Life or death’

January 16, 2026
US stocks open in the red: S&P down 0.5%, Nasdaq slips around 1%

US stocks open in the red: S&P down 0.5%, Nasdaq slips around 1%

January 16, 2026
Bank of America Q4 beat estimates, but here’s why BAC stock may stay in red

Bank of America Q4 beat estimates, but here’s why BAC stock may stay in red

January 16, 2026
Copper, aluminum climb on supply worries, but Commerzbank sees setback risk

Copper, aluminum climb on supply worries, but Commerzbank sees setback risk

January 16, 2026
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Disclaimer: Profitnewsreport.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.
Copyright © 2025 Profitnewsreport.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Thank you

Disclaimer: Profitnewsreport.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.
Copyright © 2025 Profitnewsreport.com